PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025European Heart Journal17 citationsOpen Access

Heparin administration at first medical contact vs immediately before primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the HELP-PCI trial

View Full Paper
JCJing ChenNanchang UniversityCXChangwu XuWuhan UniversityLQLiqiang QiuWuhan University

Key Points

  • Pre-treatment with heparin at first medical contact improved TFG-3 rates compared to administration in the Cath Lab.
  • The study found a significant odds ratio of 1.44 for improved spontaneous reperfusion, with P = .02.
  • Patients undergoing primary PCI across multiple centers in China were included, emphasizing effective treatment protocols.
  • No significant differences were observed in secondary endpoints or major bleeding events, indicating heparin's safety.

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims The beneficial effect of pre-treatment with unfractionated heparin (UFH) at first medical contact (FMC) before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in all-comers with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains uncertain. Methods HELP-PCI was an investigator-initiated, randomized controlled trial conducted at 36 clinical centres in China. Patients with STEMI presenting ≤12 h after symptom onset undergoing PPCI were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous administration with UFH (100 U/kg) at FMC or in the Cath Lab through a catheter sheath. The primary endpoint was Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade (TFG)-3 of infarct-related artery (IRA) at diagnostic angiography before PPCI. The secondary outcome was complete epicardial and myocardial reperfusion after PPCI and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; defined as the composite of all-cause death, cardiac death, heart failure hospitalizations, re-infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned revascularization, and stroke) at 12 months. Safety outcome was 30-day Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type ≥2 bleeding. Results A total of 999 patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI were randomly assigned to receive either UFH administration at FMC (n = 505) or in the Cath Lab (n = 494). Pre-treated population at FMC showed a higher frequency of TFG-3 of IRA compared with the Cath Lab group (23.6% vs 17.6%; odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–1.97; P = .02). There were no significant differences in secondary endpoints or in the safety endpoint, including 12-month MACCE, complete epicardial and myocardial reperfusion, and major bleeding. Conclusions Pre-treatment with loading-dose UFH at FMC was associated with an improvement of spontaneous reperfusion of IRA without increasing the risk of major bleeding.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c19f7f54b1d3bfb60dacbahttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf481
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper