Analysis reveals plural markers in Japanese apply only to count nouns, indicating implications for nominal mapping frameworks.
Japanese noun phrases are not morphologically inflected for singular/plural contrast. However, the language employs several optional plural markers. This paper argues that while Japanese lacks morphological singular/plural distinctions, the distinction is reflected semantically, as plural markers can only attach to count nouns. Additionally, the most productive plural marker, -tati, is found to be exclusively associative. This finding supports the nominal mapping hypothesis proposed by Chierchia (1998a, 1998b, 2010), indicating that Japanese does not serve as a counterexample to the framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koji Kawahara (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: