Numerical modeling shows the impact of burial depth and internal water pressure on disaster mitigation strategies, highlighting the role of geotextile configurations.
Urban subsurface pipeline bursts can induce catastrophic cascading effects, including ground collapse, infrastructure failure, and socioeconomic losses. However, stratum responses during the erosion cavity expansion phase and corresponding disaster mitigation strategies have rarely been researched. In this study, a numerical model validated through experimental tests was employed to investigate the effects of internal water pressures, burial depths, and different geotextile-based disaster mitigation strategies. It was revealed that a burial depth-dependent critical internal water pressure governed the erosion cavity expansion, and a predictive equation was derived based on the limit equilibrium theory. Higher internal water pressure accelerated the erosion cavity expansion and amplified the stratum stress within a range of twice the diameter D. Increased burial depth d reduced peak ground heave but linearly expanded the heave zone range, concurrently elevating the overall stratum stress level and generating larger stress reduction zones (i.e., when d/D = 3.0, the range of the stress reduction zone was 8.0D). All geotextile layout configurations exhibited different disaster mitigation effects (the peak ground heave was reduced by at least 15%). The semi-circular closely fitted configuration (SCCF) optimally restricted the expansion of the erosion cavity, reduced the stratum displacement (i.e., 39% reduction in the peak ground heave), and avoided stress concentration. Comprehensive analysis indicated that SCCF was suited for low-pressure pipelines in deformation-sensitive stratum and semi-circular configuration (SC) was suitable for deformation-insensitive pipeline sections. These findings provide actionable insights for tailoring mitigation strategies to specific operational risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: