Field study compares artificial neural networks and regression models for predicting cadmium levels in rice, showing BP-ANN outperforms MLR.
The translocation of cadmium (Cd) in the soil-rice system is complicated; therefore, most of the soil-plant models of Cd have not been extensively studied. Hence, we studied the back-propagation artificial neural network model (BP-ANN) and multiple regression model (MLR) to predict the cadmium (Cd) content in rice grain and soil through testing soil parameters. In this study, 486 pairs of rice grains and corresponding soil samples of 456 vectors were used for training + validation, and 30 vectors were collected from the southwestern karst area of Guangxi Province as a test data set. In this study, the Cd content in rice was successfully predicted by using the factors soil available cadmium (ACd), total soil cadmium (TCd), soil organic matter (SOM), and pH, which have a more significant impact on rice, as the main prediction variables. Root mean square error (RMSE), Relative Percent Difference (RPD), and correlation coefficient (R2) were used to assess the models. The R2, RPD, and RMSE values for RCd medium obtained by the MLR model with pH, TCd, and ACd as entered variables were 0.551, 2.398, and 0.049, respectively. The R2 and RMSE values for RCd medium obtained by the BP-ANN model with pH, TCd, and ACd as entered variables were 0.6846, 2.778, and 0.104, respectively. Therefore, it was concluded that BP-ANN was useful in predicting RCd and had better performance than MLR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: