Retrospective cohort study links sarcopenia and elevated BMI with platinum-associated adverse events in NSCLC patients, indicating heightened treatment risks.
Background: Patients with sarcopenia and elevated body mass index (BMI) are at high risk of platinum-associated adverse events (AEs). This study examines the association between sarcopenia, BMI, and AEs in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with NSCLC who started cisplatin or carboplatin between 2015 and 2022. Sarcopenia was defined on CT using sex-specific cutoffs for skeletal muscle index. We evaluated the association between CT-defined sarcopenia and grade ≥2 AEs (including anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and increased creatinine), chemotherapy discontinuation, and 90-day mortality in patients with normal (<25 kg/m 2 ) and elevated (≥25 kg/m 2 ) BMI using a Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model. The association between receiving an excess carboplatin dose and AEs was evaluated. Results: Of 604 included patients, the mean [SD] age was 66 [10] years, 307 (51%) were female, and 167 (28%) had sarcopenia. Sarcopenia and elevated BMI (n=67) was associated with an increased risk of grade ≥2 anemia (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 1.64; 95% CI, 1.17–2.29; P =.004), thrombocytopenia (sHR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.16–4.36; P =.016), and increased creatinine (sHR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.45–5.13; P =.002). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that patients whose Cockcroft-Gault–based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) dictated a carboplatin dose ≥25 mg higher than CKD-EPI GFR were at significantly higher risk of grade ≥2 AEs and chemotherapy discontinuation. Conclusions: Combined CT-defined sarcopenia with elevated BMI is associated with an increased risk of platinum-associated AEs in patients with NSCLC; this may be due to GFR misestimation in patients with low muscle mass and elevated BMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: