Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals a decline in cloud frequency in CONUS, suggesting climate feedback mechanisms are at play.
Clouds play a critical role in radiation and precipitation processes. Large-scale changes in atmospheric-oceanic circulations reshape global and continental moisture and temperature patterns that influence long-term cloud distributions. Regional surface disturbance can further complicate cloud processes and their roles in long-term land-atmosphere interactions. Understanding the long-term spatiotemporal dynamics of clouds is key to untangling complex cloud-climate feedback across scales, but it remains challenging due to a lack of reliable long-term cloud datasets due to uncertain cloud representations in numerical modeling. Using 4-km 40yr (1980-2020) convection-permitted reanalysis over CONUS (CONUS404), validated by MODIS observations to ensure accuracy, we accessed cloud changes over CONUS and their sub-regions. Results show that CONUS cloud frequency has declined in the first three decades and slightly increased in the recent decade during both daytime and nighttime, with a 40yr averaged rate of −0.06% yr −1 . Regional variations are observed with long-term feedback. Sunny regions generally have a declining cloud frequency suggesting positive feedback with rapid changes; while cloudy regions experience stabler conditions. Daytime cloudiness experienced a stronger decline than nighttime patterns across most regions except the northern regions with enhanced nocturnal cloudiness. Three types of cloud heights are overall decreasing at different rates and variability diurnally. Both high and low-level clouds show faster declines than middle-level clouds. Our findings suggest influences from large-scale drivers and diverse effects of local-regional feedback, where moisture is more influential than temperature. Observation-validated simulation over CONUS enhances understanding of cloud dynamics and provides new insights into the American climate system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: