Analysis reveals connections between fast radio bursts and pulsars, suggesting insights into magnetar environments.
The rare association of three persistent radio sources (confirmed PRS1 and PRS2, candidate PRS3) with repeating fast radio bursts (FRB 20121102A, 20190520B, 20201124A) offers a unique probe into their magneto-ionic environments. PRSs are attributed to synchrotron emission from relativistic charged particles of a magnetar wind nebula (MWN), powered by spin-down magnetohydrodynamic wind or internal magnetic field decay. Using a multizone hydrodynamic model, we track MWN evolution to constrain magnetar progenitor properties. For PRS1 and PRS2, we find an equipartition radius R eq ∼ 0.1 pc that is consistent with the radio scintillation estimates (>0.03 pc) and radio imaging limits (<0.7 pc). This compact size favors low expansion speeds and large initial spin periods, P i ≳ 10 ms, ruling out millisecond magnetar progenitors. Given P i ≳ 10 ms, a current size of ∼0.1 pc, a supernova kinetic energy E SN ∼ 1 0 50 – 1 0 51 erg, and an ejecta mass M ∼ 3–10 M ⊙ , the PRS age is t ∼ 10–10 2 yr. PRSs with t > 20 yr require an internal field ( B int ∼ 10 16 –10 16.5 G) with a decay timescale t d ∼ 10–10 2.5 yr. The slowest field decay ( t d , max ∼ 500 yr) favors subenergetic supernovae ( E SN ∼ 1 0 50 erg) with massive ejecta ( M ≳ 10 M ⊙ ) and a low-ionization fraction (∼3%). For the subenergetic scenario, for the confirmed PRSs, we predict a cooling break at 100–150 GHz at 20–40 μ Jy and self-absorption near 200 MHz at 180 μ Jy. For PRS3, a rotation-powered MWN is viable only if t ∼ 10 yr; an inverted spectrum beyond 150 GHz would rule out this scenario.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahaman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: