Examining the effects of sanctions on cultural trade reveals significant collateral damage, suggesting negative impacts on bilateral relations.
We examine how various types of sanctions—trade, financial, military, arms and travel—affect trade in cultural goods, and, for comparison, in non‐cultural goods. We find that trade sanctions have significant negative impacts on cultural and non‐cultural trade. The magnitude and nature of these impacts vary depending on the type and coverage of trade sanctions. Furthermore, our study reveals significant collateral damage to bilateral cultural trade caused by arms, military assistance, financial and travel sanctions. Conversely, non‐cultural trade is primarily influenced by financial and travel sanctions. Examining the origins of sanctions provides deeper insights into their diverse impacts. Specifically, our analysis highlights that the United States (U.S.)‐imposed sanctions across various types have significant unintended consequences for bilateral U.S. cultural trade with sanctioned countries. Similarly, both U.S. and European Union (EU) sanctions, regardless of their type, exert a substantial impact on their non‐cultural trade with sanctioned countries. Although sanctions may be justified from a political standpoint, our findings underscore the importance for policymakers to prioritise the promotion of cultural trade and its potential role in peacebuilding efforts once sanctions are lifted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cevik et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: