Clinical trial compares failure rates of orthodontic anchorage using Iranian and Korean mini-screws, suggesting both are stable.
Background: In orthodontic treatments, mini-screws are used when absolute anchorage is required for tooth movement. In daily clinical practice, it is common to observe mini-screws loosening after implantation. The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the failure rates of Iranian and Korean mini-screws utilized as orthodontic anchorage. Methods: In this study, 74 patients requiring anchorage with mini-screws in the upper jaw were randomly divided into study and control groups receiving Iranian (Poyanteb Company) and Korean (the JEIL brand) mini-screws, respectively. The patients were evaluated for stability or failure of the mini-screws at one week and then at one-, two-, and three-month intervals. Any degree of mobility was considered a failure. The data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc test, and t test. Results: There were no significant differences in the stability of Iranian and JEIL brand screws when compared at intervals of one week, one month, two months, and three months (P>0.05). Additionally, no significant differences were found when assessing the stability of Iranian and JEIL brands with 35 mini-screws in the buccal area. Finally, an examination of 39 mini-screws from both brands in the palatal region of the maxilla revealed no statistical differences. Conclusion: In comparing Iranian and JEIL brand mini-screws, no significant difference was observed in the failure rate, with both demonstrating adequate efficiency and stability. Therefore, to reduce costs for patients, Iranian brands can be utilized effectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farhadian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: