Longitudinal cohort study shows household structure and parental status influence HIV risk behaviors in adolescents, highlighting the specific needs for interventions.
Introduction: In sub-Saharan Africa, approximately six out of seven new HIV infections occur among adolescents aged 15-19 years. Adolescents face unique challenges that impact their sexual health and risk behavior. However, very few studies have systematically investigated the association between the household structure, parental co-residence and adolescent risky sexual behavior, yet understanding this association is key to designing supportive environment-specific interventions to improve these risky sexual behaviors. This study focused on the impact of household structure and coresidence on adolescent risky sexual behaviour. Methods: Data from a population-based HIV surveillance cohort was used. Household structure was defined by parents' vital status (alive or deceased), co-residence with parents, and living apart from parents. HIV risk behaviors included self-report of >=1 non-marital sexual partner, multiple sexual partners, unprotected sex with a non-marital partner, and transactional sex. Poisson regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios for each risk behavior. Results: Among adolescents 15-19 years (n=3,234), 35% lived with both parents, 2.5% were double orphans. HIV risk behaviors included non-marital sexual partnership (17.5%), multiple sexual partners (10.5%), and transactional sex (11.5%). Adolescents whose mothers were resident, with non-resident father had increased prevalence; [non-marital partner (aPR=1.46 95%CI: 1.18-1.80), unprotected sex with a non-marital partner (aPR=1.23 95%CI: 1.00-1.51)]. Adolescents with both parents outside the home had increased prevalence; [multiple sexual partners (aPR=1.35 95%CI: 1.04-1.75), transactional sex (aPR=1.51 95%CI: 1.11-2.05)] as compared to those living with both parents. Conclusion: Household structure and co-residence with parents play significant roles in shaping the sexual behaviors of adolescents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayebale et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: