This research reveals how nonparametric variable importance can improve predictive models, indicating validity in two-phase studies.
We consider a common nonparametric regression setting, where the data consist of a response variable Y, some easily obtainable covariates X, and a set of costly covariates Z. Before establishing predictive models for Y, a natural question arises: Is it worthwhile to include Z as predictors, given the additional cost of collecting data on Z for both training the models and predicting Y for future individuals? Therefore, we aim to conduct preliminary investigations to infer importance of Z in predicting Y in the presence of X. To achieve this goal, we propose a nonparametric variable importance measure for Z. It is defined as a parameter that aggregates maximum potential contributions of Z in single or multiple predictive models, with contributions quantified by general loss functions. Considering two-phase data that provide a large number of observations for (Y,X) with the expensive Z measured only in a small subsample, we develop a novel approach to infer the proposed importance measure, accommodating missingness of Z in the sample by substituting functions of (Y,X) for each individual’s contribution to the predictive loss of models involving Z. Our approach attains unified and efficient inference regardless of whether Z makes zero or positive contribution to predicting Y, a desirable yet surprising property owing to data incompleteness. As intermediate steps of our theoretical development, we establish novel results in two relevant research areas, semi-supervised inference and two-phase nonparametric estimation. Numerical results from both simulated and real data demonstrate superior performance of our approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: