This essay critiques research on intangible asset capitalization, highlighting inconsistencies in investor inference based on accounting data.
SYNOPSIS This essay critiques empirical research that purports to support the accounting policy of capitalization of intangible assets. The critique is two-fold. First, the conclusions from the research are inconsistent with rational decision theory about how investors make inferences from accounting information. Second, the way the empirical analysis is constructed to reach those conclusions fails to introduce the information from which a rational investor assesses the payoff to intangible assets. JEL Classifications: M21; M40; M41.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen H. Penman (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: