This review analyzes LLM trading assistants' effects on price discovery and conduct-risk controls in market dynamics.
Major sell-side institutions have begun embedding large-language-model (LLM) “desk copilots” such as Bank of America’s Maestro and Goldman Sachs’ GS AI Assistant into sales-and-trading workflows to synthesize internal research, client flow data, and market-microstructure signals in real time (Financial News London, 2024; Reuters, 2024). This review paper surveys the emerging body of academic, regulatory, and practitioner literature on generative-AI trade assistants (GATAs), framing their potential to reshape pre-trade analytics across equities, foreign exchange, and derivatives markets. We synthesize findings on three core dimensions—information asymmetry, order-routing efficiency, and conduct-risk controls—and propose a conceptual evaluation framework to guide regulators and market participants. The paper concludes by identifying open research questions around model governance, fairness, and systemic risk propagation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikhil Jarunde (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: