N-body simulations reveal the impact of tidal stripping on stellar clumps in the Sparkler galaxy, indicating potential for globular cluster formation.
Recent James Webb Space Telescope observations detected a system of stellar clumps around the z≃1.4 gravitationally lensed Sparkler galaxy (of stellar mass M_*∼10^9 with ages and metallicities compatible with globular cluster (GC) progenitors. However, most of their masses (>10⁶ and sizes (>30$ pc) are about ten times those of GCs in the local Universe. To assess whether these clumps can evolve into GC-like objects, we performed N-body simulations of their dynamical evolution from z≃1.4 to z=0 (∼9.23 Gyr) under the effect of dynamical friction and tidal stripping. We studied dynamical friction by performing multiple runs of a system of clumps in a Sparkler-like spherical halo of mass M_ ≃5 that was inferred from the stellar-to-halo mass relation. For the tidal stripping, we simulated resolved clumps orbiting in an external static gravitational potential including the same halo as in the dynamical friction simulations and a Sparkler-like stellar disc. Dynamical friction causes the clumps with a mass greater than $10^7 to sink into the central galaxy regions, possibly contributing to the bulge growth. In absence of tidal stripping, the mass distribution of the surviving clumps (≈40%) peaks at ≈5 implying the presence of uncommonly over-massive clumps at z=0. Tidal shocks from the stellar disc strip considerable mass from low-mass clumps, but their sizes remain larger than those of present-day GCs. When the surviving clumps are corrected for tidal stripping, their mass distribution peak shifts to ∼2 that is compatible with very massive GCs. Our simulations suggest that a fraction of the Sparkler clumps is expected to fall into the central regions, where they might become bulge fossil fragments or contribute to the formation of a nuclear star cluster. The remaining clumps are too large in size to be progenitors of GCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giunchi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: