Analysis reveals that historical cost measurement enhances investment efficiency in volatile markets, indicating critical calibration of investors' attentiveness.
We study the investment efficiency of the historical cost and fair value measurement rules when a reporting firm and its investors confront higher-order uncertainty inferring the behavior of others. Although all investors are attentive to the firm’s report, the firm and investors incorrectly believe only some investors are attentive. We find that a report prepared under the historical cost rule yields greater investment efficiency than under the fair value rule if and only if (1) the investors are badly calibrated, (2) the firm’s production technology exhibits sufficiently strong returns to scale, (3) the firm’s productivity realization is sufficiently negatively correlated with market returns, and (4) the firm is sufficiently well calibrated about its investors’ attentiveness. JEL Classifications: C72; D80; D83; M41.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stocken et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: