Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025Journal of architecture and civil engineering.

Analysis of Risk Management and Internal Control Implementation in the Procurement of Construction Goods/Services in the Area of Probolinggo City Government, East Java Province

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

NSN. SaraswatiSHSyarif HidayatNSNusa Sebayang

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis reveals 11 priority risks in procurement, highlighting the need for effective internal control.

Key Points

  • Risk analysis using FMEA identified 'Delayed payment due to incomplete supporting documents' as the highest risk.
  • The RPN value for this risk was found to be 318.01, indicating significant potential for delays and financial losses.
  • Qualitative methods identified risks while quantitative methods calculated risk prioritization values from questionnaires.
  • The study emphasizes the importance of effective risk management and internal control to enhance procurement integrity.

Cite This Study

Saraswati et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a5f254b1d3bfb60df971https://doi.org/10.35629/8193-1007117127
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Risk Analysis of E-Procurement Process of EPC Construction Project Based On Risk Management2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Risk Analysis of Contractor Selection in Construction Work Procurement2024
  3. 3Evaluation of the Impact of Probity Audit on Fraud Prevention Influence in Government Procurement of Goods/Services2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4The Internal and External Factors in Prevention of Procurement Fraud in Goods and Services Based on E-Procurement2024
  5. 5The Effectiveness of the Procurement at the Construction Services Selection Implementation Center2024 · 4 citations