This analysis reveals how quanta, as conscious entities, influence evolution and information dynamics.
As we go back in time, the knowledge of how to make something is continuously decreasing. 5 million years ago there is no living being called human. That means humans decomposed into its atoms and molecules. 4 billion years ago the entire living world disappears and are decomposed into their components. 5 billion years ago our world and our solar system are also destroyed. 13 billion years ago, all stars and galaxies were disappearing, disintegrating into their constituent parts. Geologic and astrophysical data show that nature, as well as all living and non-living things on it, were decomposed into their components as we went back to the past, and that they were decomposed into the smallest structural elements in nature, called quanta. Ca. 13 billion year ago universe consisted of a huge number of quanta amounting 10 to the power of hundred-odd. Those quanta were tiny living units of very short life vibrating and colliding with each other, hence in a very uncomfortable manner. Quanta behaves not randomly. They make probability calculations to make a movement. They are aware of the fact whether they are free or observed. They can detect the peculiarities of all substance around themselves instantaneously without going to them. All those peculiarities show that quanta are conscious, hence smallest living objects. To get a more comfortable life they combined in higher-level systems. This tendency to get a more comfortable life let them to construct higher-level systems leading to an evolution. Nature consists of chemical elements being constructed continuously. They are constructed with conscious aggregation of things & beings due to increase of information development. Therefore, time is the results of compositional changes of matters due to information development. Thus, the physics of dynamical systems, summarized as Information and self-organization was developed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
İsmet Gedik (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: