Observational analysis reveals hepatic iodine-131 accumulation predicts disease progression in differentiated thyroid cancer, indicating significant prognostic value.
A Iodine-131 (131I) whole body scan (WBS) is performed to evaluate the treatment response after radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy. Despite the clinical relevance of RAI-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer, a consensus on its precise definition remains lacking. This study investigates the potential utility of hepatic 131I accumulation as an early predictor for tumor recurrence or progression after RAI administration. Of 814 patients receiving care at our institution, we enrolled 225 patients who exhibited no accumulation of RAI in the remnant tissues or other lesions on 131I WBS. We quantified the hepatic uptake ratio [defined as (hepatic uptake/background uptake (H/B)] from WBS. All patients were categorized into group A (H/B ≤1.5) and group B (H/B >1.5), and we assessed between-group differences. The Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test were used to analyze the progression-free survival (PFS). Using the Cox proportional hazards model, we identified independent prognostic factors from among the seven known prognostic factors, i.e., H/B, thyroglobulin, sex, age, stage, total 131I dose, and final therapeutic dose. The 5-year and median PFS were 98.8% and 114.7 months in group A (n: 171) compared with 24.1% and 42.7% months in group B (n: 54), respectively. Group B showed a significant correlation with poor prognosis (p<0.00001). Of the seven prognostic factors, H/B exhibited the highest impact on patient outcomes (hazards ratio for recurrence/disease progression, 42.156; 95% confidence interval: 8.750-203.106). Quantitative evaluation of hepatic uptake on 131I WBS provides a marker that may help identify patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who are at a high risk of disease progression/recurrence immediately after RAI therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakayama et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: