Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis reveals distinct edge colorings in graphs, suggesting improvements in agricultural forecasting.
Let $G(V,E)$ represent a simple, finite, and connected graph with $|V| = p$ and $|E| = q$. A bijection f: V(G) \1,2,3, , |V(G)|\ is defined as an edge antimagic labeling of G if the edge weights $w(uv) = f(u) + f(v)$, where uv ∈ E(G), are all distinct. This labeling induces a lea coloring of G, where each edge is assigned a color based on its weight $w(e)$. The graph G is said to have a local $(a,d)$-edge antimagic coloring if the edge colors form an arithmetic sequence with an initial term a and a common difference d. The edge weights then belong to an arithmetic progression , a + d, a + 2d, , a + (k - 1)d\, where a, d ≥ 1 are integers, and k represents the number of distinct colors used. The minimum number of colors required for G to admit a local $(a,d)$-edge antimagic coloring is called the local $(a,d)$-edge antimagic chromatic number, denoted by χle(a,d)(G). This coloring is referred to as lea$(a,d)$ coloring. In this study, we establish both the lower and upper bounds of χle(a,d)(G) and identify the exact values for specific graph classes. Additionally, we demonstrate the practical application of local $(a,d)$-edge antimagic coloring by employing it in the analysis of the Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Network (STGNN) model to support autonomous Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) in forecasting NPK concentration trends for companion plantations over multiple time steps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kristiana et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: