Performance analysis reveals GK2A's fog detection accuracy varies by time and location, suggesting data limitations.
This study evaluated the performance of the operational GK2A (GEO-KOMPSAT-2A) fog detection algorithm (GK2A_FDA) using ground-based visibility meter data from 176 stations across South Korea from 2021 to 2023. According to the verification method using the nearest pixel and 3 × 3 neighborhood pixel approaches to the visibility meter, the 3-year average probability of detection (POD) is 0.59 and 0.70, the false alarm ratio (FAR) is 0.86 and 0.81, and the bias is 4.25 and 3.73, respectively. POD is highest during daytime (0.72; bias: 7.34), decreases at night (0.57; bias: 3.89), and is lowest at twilight (0.52; bias: 2.36). The seasonal mean POD is 0.65 in winter, 0.61 in spring and autumn, and 0.47 in summer, with August reaching the minimum value, 0.33. While POD is higher in coastal areas than inland areas, inland regions show lower FAR, indicating more stable performance. Over-detections occurred regardless of geographic location and time, mainly due to the misclassification of low-level clouds and cloud edges as fog. Especially after sunrise, the fog dissipated and transformed into low-level clouds. These findings suggest that there are limitations to improving fog detection levels using satellite data alone, especially when the surface is obscured by clouds, indicating the need to utilize other data sources, such as objective ground-based analysis data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: