Grounded theory study presents a model for integrating spiritual competencies into healthcare training.
Given the growing role of humanistic components in medicine and the significance of religion/ spirituality in healthcare, medical practitioners must acquire religious/ spiritual competencies. This study aimed to develop and present a paradigmatic model for fostering religious/spiritual competencies within Iran's medical education system. The study was conducted in 2022 at Qom University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Using a qualitative grounded-theory approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 medical education experts (each with ≥ 5 years of experience). Data analysis included open, axial, and selective coding that were performed through constant comparisons to identify main themes and represent their interrelationships as a model. Integrity -the coherent integration of religious and spiritual values into clinical practice and decision-making- emerged as the main theme or core category of the study, around which other categories were formed and organized to form a paradigmatic model: Motives: Islamic spirituality, Persian medicine tradition, global experiences, and future trends; Strategies: paradigm shift, collaboration, integration, and interdisciplinary approach; Intervening Conditions: conceptual differences and dynamic environment; and finally the Consequences: transcendence, patient-centeredness, and accountability. This was considered in a multilayer context. The proposed model provides a roadmap for integrating religious/spiritual training into medical education, highlights key enablers and barriers, and suggests that targeted interventions can enhance practitioners' integrity. Limitations include the study's focus on Iranian institutions; future research should validate the model across diverse cultural and healthcare settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heidari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: