Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An algorithm estimates recognition reliability in EEG-based aBCIs using confidence scores, enhancing user trust.
Recent years, the diverse applications of electroencephalography (EEG) - based affective brain-computer interfaces (aBCIs) are being extensively explored. However, due to adverse factors like noise and physiological variability, the recognition capability of aBCIs can unforeseeably suffer abrupt declines. Since the timing of these aBCI failures is unknown, placing trust in aBCIs without scrutiny can lead to undesirable consequences. To alleviate this issue, we propose an algorithm for estimating the reliability of aBCI (primarily Graph Convolutional Network), synchronously delivering a probabilistic confidence score upon aBCI decision completion, thereby reflecting the aBCI's real-time recognition capabilities. Methodologically, we use the Maximum Softmax Probability (MSP) from EEG recognition networks as confidence scores and leverage the Scaling Operator to calibrate them. Then, the Projection Operator is employed to address confidence estimation biases caused by noise and subject variability. For the numerical concentration of MSP, we provide fresh insights into its causes and propose corresponding solutions. The derivation of the estimator from the Maximum Entropy Principle is also substantiated for robust theoretical underpinnings. Finally, we confirm theoretically that the estimator does not compromise BCI performance. In experiments conducted on public datasets SEED and SEED-IV, the proposed algorithm demonstrates superior performance in estimating aBCIs reliability compared to other benchmarks, and commendable adaptability to new subjects. This research has the potential to lead to more trustworthy aBCIs and advance their broader application in complex real-world scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: