Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case study shows copper-based fillers impact corrosion in porous copper foam, suggesting aggressive environments increase risks.
The brazing of porous copper foam (PCF) heat exchanger using copper‐based filler of copper‐tin‐nickel‐phosphorus (Cu‐Sn‐Ni‐P) could lead to a corrosion when exposed to an aggressive environment. The research on corrosion of copper‐based fillers and brazed joint interface between substrate and foam were carried out. The cyclic polarization of 10Sn6Ni7P, 9Sn7Ni6P and 4Sn10Ni8P fillers reveal that the corrosion potential ( E corr ) was shifted from less noble to more noble potentials. While corrosion density ( I corr ) shows 10Sn6Ni7P, 9Sn7Ni6P and 4Sn10Ni8P fillers shifted from more negative to more positive potentials. On the other hand, porous copper foam was brazed with copper using copper‐based filler and immersed in 3.5 % sodium chloride (NaCl) for 7 days. Optical microscope (OM) shows a thicker patina layer formation on joining interface of copper/porous copper foam (Cu/PCF) using 10Sn6Ni7P filler after the immersion test. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy‐dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy (EDX) discover a formation of copper chloride (CuCl) on the unclean immersed specimens and a copper (II) oxide (Cu 2 O) compound on the clean immersed specimens. The chloride was found to selectively attack on the copper along the filler's area due to a more noble of copper phosphide (Cu 3 P) compared to copper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zahri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: