PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Nature Communications13 citationsOpen Access

Personalized ML-based wearable robot control improves impaired arm function

View Full Paper
JAJames ArnoldPPPrabhat PathakYJYichu Jin

Key Points

  • The personalized ML controller improved shoulder movement identification accuracy to 94.2%, enhancing usability.
  • Participants showed a 31.9% reduction in arm-lowering force with the new controller compared to the baseline.
  • The technology also increased shoulder elevation/depression by 17.5°, elbow flexion by 10.6°, and wrist motion by 7.6°.
  • Significant improvements were noted in trunk compensation and hand-path efficiency, reducing compensation by 25.4%.

Abstract

Portable wearable robots offer promise for assisting people with upper limb disabilities. However, movement variability between individuals and trade-offs between supportiveness and transparency complicate robot control during real-world tasks. We address these challenges by first developing a personalized ML intention detection model to decode user's motion intention from IMU and compression sensors. Second, we leverage a physics-based hysteresis model to enhance control transparency and adapt it for practical use in real-world tasks. Third, we combine and integrate these two models into a real-time controller to modulate the assistance level based on the user's intention and kinematic state. Fourth, we evaluate the effectiveness of our control strategy in improving arm function in a multi-day evaluation. For 5 individuals post-stroke and 4 living with ALS wearing a soft shoulder robot, we demonstrate that the controller identifies shoulder movement with 94.2% accuracy from minimal change in the shoulder angles (elevation: 3.4°, depression: 1.7°) and reduces arm-lowering force by 31.9% compared to a baseline controller. Furthermore, the robot improves movement quality by increasing their shoulder elevation/depression (17.5°), elbow (10.6°) and wrist flexion/extension (7.6°) ROMs; reducing trunk compensation (up to 25.4%); and improving hand-path efficiency (up to 53.8%).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arnold et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1aab854b1d3bfb60e2995https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62538-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper