PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Journal of the American Chemical Society54 citations

Support-Accelerated Proton Transfer for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution Catalysis

View Full Paper
WLWenrui LiJLJianning LvXCXianchun Chen

Key Points

  • Support-accelerated proton transfer improved the turnover frequency to 3.35 s-1 for IrO2/OH-ZrP.
  • In situ spectroscopy and electrochemical measurements showed a significant role for -OH groups in OER processes.
  • The unique mechanism of proton transfer may reshape approaches to catalyst design and efficiency.
  • Engineering catalyst supports can lead to remarkable improvements in reaction rates for electrocatalysts.

Abstract

Catalyst supports are conventionally regarded as inert substrates for dispersing and stabilizing active species. Here we show that supports can be deliberately engineered to actively participate in catalytic reactions by accelerating interfacial proton transfer in oxygen evolution reaction (OER). IrO2 clusters were supported on hydroxyl- and methyl-functionalized zirconium phosphate, yielding IrO2/OH-ZrP and IrO2/CH3-ZrP, respectively. In-situ spectroscopy, electrochemical measurements and theoretical calculations reveal that, different from IrO2/CH3-ZrP, which follows the conventional adsorbate evolution mechanism (AEM), the -OH groups in IrO2/OH-ZrP directly participate in OER by lowering *OOH deprotonation barrier and significantly facilitating proton transfer, leading to a Support-Accelerated Proton Transfer AEM (SAEM). Notably, rotation-dependent OER activity studies coupled with local pH measurements provide direct and compelling evidence of the support-mediated proton transfer process. Consequently, IrO2/OH-ZrP achieves a turnover frequency of 3.35 s-1 at an overpotential of 300 mV, 2.99 times higher than that of IrO2/CH3-ZrP. This study underscores the significance of support engineering in proton-transfer limiting reactions and provides new insights into electrocatalyst design beyond active site engineering.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1aacc54b1d3bfb60e362chttps://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c10092
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enrooted‐Type Metal‐Support Interaction Boosting Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Acidic Media2024 · 57 citations
  2. 2Rationally designed Ru catalysts supported on TiN for highly efficient and stable hydrogen evolution in alkaline conditions2024 · 130 citations
  3. 3Accelerated Proton Transfer in Asymmetric Active Units for Sustainable Acidic Oxygen Evolution Reaction2024 · 170 citations
  4. 4Lanthanide-regulating Ru-O covalency optimizes acidic oxygen evolution electrocatalysis2024 · 359 citations
  5. 5Materials for solar fuels and chemicals2016 · 1,564 citations