Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bibliometric analysis identifies critical factors influencing doctoral attrition, suggesting improved support for graduate students.
Doctoral Attrition (DA) is the phenomenon of graduate students discontinuing Ph.D. studies due to individual or combined factors, such as lack of academic integration, insufficient supervisor support, immense publication pressure, gender bias, burnout, and inadequate financial assistance. DA rates vary from 25-40% in Science, 36% in Engineering, and 57% globally. As current pedagogical landscapes evolve to incorporate Education 5.0 (E.D. 5.0) goals, it becomes imperative to support and provide resources to graduate students that foster positive Ph.D. experiences, preparing them to meet Industry 5.0 (I.D. 5.0) competencies post-graduation. Using bibliometric analysis based on our hypotheses-derived Research Questions (RQs) on Scopus, we map out key factors and attributes perceived as most valuable for successful Ph.D. journeys over the past decade, particularly in STEM fields. Recognizing these gaps will help (i) improve student dynamics, (ii) empower personalized learning to meet E.D. 5.0 objectives, and (iii) promote best practices for graduate student success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chakraborty et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: