Retrospective study found high prevalence of palatoradicular grooves in maxillary anterior teeth, suggesting important diagnostic implications.
This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, morphological types, and distribution patterns of palatoradicular grooves (PRGs) in maxillary anterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in a Turkish population. CBCT images of 1553 patients from the radiology archive of Ordu University Faculty of Dentistry (2021–2022) were reviewed. A total of 920 patients (4012 teeth) met the inclusion criteria. The presence, type, and localization of PRGs were assessed. Groove types were classified as Type 1, 2, 3A, or 3B; localization was recorded as mesial, distal, or midpalatal. Bilateral and unilateral occurrences were also analyzed. Statistical analysis involved chi-square tests, Tukey’s HSD, and Cohen’s kappa for intra-observer reliability. PRGs were detected in 23.6% of patients and 10.42% of teeth. Lateral incisors were most affected (87.56%). Type 1 grooves were most common (71.53%), with midpalatal localization being most frequent (54.07%). Bilateral grooves were significantly more prevalent than unilateral ones (p < 0.001). No significant association was found between groove type and tooth type or between gender and bilaterality. This study revealed a high prevalence of PRGs, especially in maxillary lateral incisors, with a significant tendency toward bilateral and midpalatal presentation. CBCT proved essential for detecting palatoradicular grooves, aiding diagnosis and treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baştuğ et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: