NMR measurements reveal the insulating properties of Pb10−xCux(PO4)6O, suggesting minimal copper substitution.
The report of the first room-temperature, ambient-pressure superconductivity in copper-doped lead apatite Pb10−xCux(PO4)6O has attracted lots of attention. However, subsequent studies revealed the presence of numerous impurity phases in the polycrystalline sample, and the sharp superconducting-like transition is not due to a superconducting transition but most likely due to a reduction in resistivity caused by the first-order structural phase transition of Cu2S at around 385 K from the β phase at high temperature to the γ phase at low temperature. Before now, only bulk measurements have been performed on a Pb10−xCux(PO4)6O powder sample, which could be affected by the impurity phases, masking the intrinsic properties of Pb10−xCux(PO4)6O. In this study, 31P and 63/65Cu nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements have been performed on a Pb10−xCux(PO4)6O powder sample to investigate its physical properties from a microscopic point of view. Our NMR data evidence the non-magnetic insulating nature of Pb10−xCux(PO4)6O without any trace of electron correlation effects. Furthermore, the 63/65Cu NMR results suggest that no copper or very little copper is substituted for Pb in Pb10(PO4)6O prepared by sintering Pb2SO5 and Cu3P.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: