Prospective trial assesses migration in uncemented femoral stems, showing comparable results for implants with calcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite coatings.
Background and purpose The design and coating of uncemented joint implants impact bone ingrowth and thereby the stability of the implant. This prospective randomized clinical trial aimed to compare early migration of two uncemented, similarly shaped femoral stems with either calcium phosphate or hydroxyapatite coating. Patients and methods 93 patients (102 hips) were randomized to either an intervention calcium phosphate or a conventional hydroxyapatite-coated stem. Migration measurements were performed postoperatively, and at 6 weeks, 3, 12 months, and 2 and 5 years after operation, and analyzed with radiostereometric analysis. Results There were no significant differences in migration between the two stems from postoperative to 5-year follow-up. With 6 weeks follow-up as baseline, the calcium phosphate coated stem showed a tendency towards migrating less with a maximum total point motion up to 2 years of 0.84 mm (0.68 to 1.00 95% CI) compared to the hydroxyapatite-coated stem which migrated 1.25 mm (0.99 to 1.52 95% CI) ( P = 0.010). Conclusions Our data show that the calcium phosphate-coated stem is a safe implant in terms of ingrowth stability, and with migration patterns comparable to a hydroxyapatite-coated stem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kristoffersson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: