Comment critiques AI welfare, prioritizing living beings over algorithms and outlining the Precarity Guideline.
In this Comment, we critique the growing “AI welfare” movement and propose a novel guideline, the Precarity Guideline, to determine care entitlement. In contrast to approaches that emphasize potential for suffering, the Precarity Guideline is grounded in empirically identifiable features. The severity of ongoing humanitarian crises, biodiversity loss, and climate change provides additional reasons to prioritize the needs of living beings over machine learning algorithms as candidates for care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dorsch et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: