PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Moscow University Bulletin Series 21 Public administration0 citations

The Political Determinism of the RSFSR’s Economic Policy in the Market Reforms of 1991

View Full Paper
ILIlya Sergeevich Logvenkov

Key Points

  • The analysis shows the political crisis in autumn 1991 influenced economic policy decisions and market reforms.
  • By October 1991, the collapse of political coalitions and regional influences pushed Yeltsin to adopt rapid economic changes.
  • Historical-genetic and abstract-logical methods were employed to analyze the impact of political decisions on economic strategies.
  • The findings highlight the struggles in implementing the initial economic reforms due to regional instability and Western alignment needs.

Abstract

Study examines the interplay between political motivations and the formulation of economic policy in the state decision-making process that initiated radical market reforms in Russia in October 1991. Employing the historical-genetic method, the research evaluates the role of external and internal factors that predetermined the choice of market transformation programs. The abstract-logical method is applied to identify distortions in the original reform blueprint following Yeltsin’s policy address to the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR on October 28, 1991. The study demonstrates that by autumn 1991, the country stood on the brink of a systemic political crisis. This crisis unfolded under two interrelated circumstances: the collapse of the anti-Union coalition in the Russian parliament and the persistent influence of anti-Yeltsin forces at the regional level. In this context, holding regional, territorial, and republican elections risked institutionalizing state fragmentation and paralyzing central authority. The presidency faced the imperative to retain emergency powers for appointing regional administrative heads and secure a temporary moratorium on elections. The response was a shift toward rapid market transformation. Key features of this decision included the announcement of price liberalization, a pro-Western orientation in the presidential program, and Yeltsin’s assumption of the premiership. While these measures enabled the launch of reforms and the suspension of regional elections through a consolidated act of government branches, subsequent developments—such as the collapse of consumer markets and the need to align with Western states and international organizations—rendered the original reform agenda unfeasible within the declared timeframe.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ilya Sergeevich Logvenkov (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1ad6a54b1d3bfb60e5ef9https://doi.org/10.55959/msu2073-2643-21-2025-2-27-46
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Анисимова Д.В. Монетарные реформы Великого княжества Финляндского в контексте интеграционной политики Российской империи2019 · 2 citations
  2. 2Relations between central and regional executive authorities in the context of preparation for radical market reforms in Russia at the end of 19912024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Privatization without Capitalism: The Social Relations of Property in Post-Communist Transitions2020 · 6 citations
  4. 4The Tragedy of Russia's Reforms: Market Bolshevism against Democracy. Peter Reddaway and Dmitri Glinski, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2000. 745 pp. $29.95.2001 · 1 citations
  5. 5Mortality in Russia Since the Fall of the Soviet Union2021 · 33 citations