Cross-sectional survey assesses first aid knowledge and application of Heimlich Maneuver among Shenzhen residents, highlighting training gaps.
This study evaluates the awareness and practical application of the Heimlich Maneuver among residents of Shenzhen, a rapidly urbanizing region in China, to address the gap in region-specific first aid knowledge. It examines factors influencing awareness and application and explores the relationship between training, knowledge, and behavior to inform public health interventions. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Shenzhen residents aged 18 years and older using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire covered demographics, awareness, knowledge, application, and learning behaviors. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), employing Chi-square tests and correlation analyses to assess associations between demographic factors and awareness. Of 492 valid responses, 94.1% were aware of the Heimlich Maneuver, but only 40.9% knew how to perform it. Awareness was significantly associated with gender (p = 0.013), age (p = 0.005), occupation (p = 0.014), and education (p = 0.037). Healthcare professionals and those with higher education demonstrated greater knowledge. Only 27.6% had received training, with 34.6% of trained individuals applying the maneuver in real-life scenarios. Awareness correlated positively with training (χ² = 24.003, p < 0.01) and application (χ² = 7.868, p = 0.049). Most respondents (81.9%) were willing to learn, preferring short videos and community activities. Despite high awareness, the practical application of the Heimlich Maneuver in Shenzhen remains limited. Targeted, hands-on training using modern media and community programs can enhance skills, particularly among healthcare workers and educated individuals, supporting effective public health education strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: