Psychological safety is essential in healthcare, allowing team members to express ideas, seek help, and acknowledge mistakes without fear of negative consequences. While leaders play a critical role in fostering this environment, there is limited understanding of the specific behaviors they employ. This qualitative study explores how healthcare leaders perceive, implement, and interpret their efforts to cultivate psychological safety within their teams. Through in-depth interviews and thematic analysis, six key themes emerged: (1) leaders are driven by both personal and organizational motivations, (2) building strong relationships is fundamental to psychological safety, (3) democratic leadership practices encourage open communication, (4) leaders reinforce safety through their responses to critical incidents, (5) organizational barriers create challenges, and (6) leadership efforts lead to observable behavioral changes in teams. These findings highlight that cultivating psychological safety is a dynamic and ongoing process, requiring adaptive leadership strategies rather than rigid, prescriptive approaches. Despite challenges such as inconsistent organizational support and policy enforcement, leaders emphasize the importance of empathy, collaboration, and proactive engagement. This study contributes to leadership literature by offering insights into the interplay between individual leadership behaviors and systemic factors in promoting psychological safety. It provides practical recommendations for healthcare leaders, advocating for a shift toward relationship-based, flexible leadership practices to enhance team dynamics and patient care. Future research should explore how leadership strategies can continue to evolve in high-stakes healthcare environments.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Muhammad Tanveer Riaz
University of Engineering and Technology Lahore
Iram Yousaf
CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry
Sajila Yousaf
The critical review of social sciences studies
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Riaz et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1ae7054b1d3bfb60e65c9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.59075/z09n3q18