Observational analysis improves orbit determination accuracy in cislunar satellites, indicating effective SST links.
In response to the increasing demand for high-precision navigation of satellites operating in the cislunar space, this study introduces an onboard orbit determination algorithm considering both convergence and computational efficiency, referred to as the Sliding-Window Batch Processing (SWBP) algorithm. This algorithm combines the strengths of data batch processing and the sequential processing algorithm, utilizing measurement data from multiple historical and current epochs to update the orbit state of the current epoch. This algorithm facilitates rapid convergence in orbit determination, even in instances where the initial orbit error is large. The SWBP algorithm has been used to evaluate the navigation performance in the Distant Retrograde Orbit (DRO) and the Earth–Moon transfer orbit. The scenario involves a low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellite establishing satellite-to-satellite tracking (SST) links with both a DRO satellite and an Earth–Moon transfer satellite. The LEO satellite can determine its orbit accurately by receiving GNSS signals. The experiments show that the DRO satellite achieves an orbit determination accuracy of 100 m within 100 h under an initial position error of 500 km, and the transfer orbit satellite reaches an orbit determination accuracy of 600 m within 3.5 h under an initial position error of 100 km. When the Earth–Moon transfer satellite exhibits a large initial orbital error (on the order of hundreds of kilometers) or the LEO satellite’s positional accuracy is degraded, the SWBP algorithm demonstrates superior convergence speed and precision in orbit determination compared to the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF). This confirms the proposed algorithm’s capability to handle complex orbital determination scenarios effectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: