Narrative analysis reveals children's roles in Daniel 1–2, highlighting identity and resistance against authority.
This paper analyses the role and position of Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah in the narratives of the first two chapters of Daniel from a childist perspective and with an intersectional lens, in order to explore how their identity as children instead of the ‘young men’ they have often been taken for, changes our interpretation of the narratives. A narrative analysis of the texts shows that the three characters, in a vulnerable and formative phase of their lives as growing boys in a foreign land, act extraordinarily bravely for their age by rejecting the king’s diet and grow into mature men who are able to take on the responsibility of governing a province.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laura Pasterkamp (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: