PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Nature Methods135 citationsOpen Access

Deep-learning-based gene perturbation effect prediction does not yet outperform simple linear baselines

View Full Paper
CAConstantin Ahlmann-EltzeWHWolfgang HuberSASimon Anders

Key Points

  • Deep learning models failed to outperform simple linear baselines for gene perturbation predictions.
  • Despite testing various models, none surpassed baseline performance, highlighting method evaluation's necessity.
  • Comparison included five deep learning models, pointing to critical gaps in their effectiveness for transcription prediction.
  • The findings suggest a need for thorough benchmarking in the development of advanced predictive models.

Abstract

Recent research in deep-learning-based foundation models promises to learn representations of single-cell data that enable prediction of the effects of genetic perturbations. Here we compared five foundation models and two other deep learning models against deliberately simple baselines for predicting transcriptome changes after single or double perturbations. None outperformed the baselines, which highlights the importance of critical benchmarking in directing and evaluating method development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ahlmann-Eltze et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1afd354b1d3bfb60e7fb7https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-025-02772-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper