Context. About half of the mass of all heavy elements with mass number A > 90 is formed through the slow neutron capture process ( s -process), occurring in evolved asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars with masses of ∼1 − 6 M ⊙ . The s -process can be studied by modeling the evolution of barium (Ba), CH, and carbon-enhanced metal-poor (CEMP)-s stars. Aims. Comparing observationally derived surface parameters and 1D local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) abundance patterns of s -process elements to theoretical binary accretion models, we aim to understand the formation of post-accretion systems. We explore the extent of dilution of the accreted material and describe the impact of convective mixing on the observed surface abundances. Methods. We computed a new grid of 2691 stellar evolution models for low-mass post-accretion systems, including accretion from an AGB companion. A maximum-likelihood comparison to surface parameters and derived abundances determines the best fit models for a large observational sample of Ba, CH, and CEMP-s stars. Results. We find consistent AGB donor masses in the mass range of 2 − 3 M ⊙ across our sample of post-accretion stars. We find the formation scenario for weak Ba stars is an AGB star transferring a moderate amount of mass (≤0.5 M ⊙ ) resulting in a ∼2.0 − 2.5 M ⊙ Ba star. The strong Ba stars are best fit with lower final masses ∼1.0 − 2.0 M ⊙ and significant accreted mass (≥0.5 M ⊙ ). The CH and CEMP-s stars display lower final masses (∼1.0 M ⊙ ) and small amounts of transferred material (∼0.1 M ⊙ ). Conclusions. We find that Ba stars generally accrete more material than CEMP-s and CH stars. We also find that strong Ba stars must accrete more than 0.50 M ⊙ to explain their abundance patterns, and in this limit we are unable to reproduce the observed mass distribution of strong Ba stars. The mass distributions of the weak Ba stars, CEMP-s, and CH stars are well reproduced in our modeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dimoff et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: