Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The a priori procedure establishes confidence intervals and sample size for location parameters in skew-normal distributions, indicating broader applications.
The a priori procedure (APP) is concerned with determining appropriate sample sizes to ensure that sample statistics to be obtained are likely to be good estimators of corresponding population parameters. Previous researchers have shown how to compute a priori confidence interval means or locations for normal and skew-normal distributions. However, two critical limitations persist in the literature: (1) While numerous skewed models have been proposed, the APP equations for location parameters have only been formally established for the basic skew-normal distributions. (2) Even within this fundamental framework, the APPs for sample size determinations in estimating locations are constructed on samples of specifically dependent observations having multivariate skew-normal distributions jointly. Our work addresses these limitations by extending a priori reasoning to the more comprehensive unified skew-normal (SUN) distribution. The SUN family not only encompasses multiple existing skew-normal models as special cases but also enables broader practical applications through its capacity to model mixed skewness patterns and diverse tail behaviors. In this paper, we establish APP equations for determining the required sample sizes and set up confidence intervals for the location parameter in the one-sample case, as well as for the difference in locations in matched pairs and two independent samples, assuming independent observations from the SUN family. This extension addresses a critical gap in the literature and offers a valuable contribution to the field. Simulation studies support the equations presented, and two applications involve real data sets for illustrations of our main results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: