Prospective study finds liberal fluid fasting is safe for geriatric patients, suggesting an adjustment to fasting protocols.
Background: The rationale for strict fluid fasting for pediatric and adult patients has been questioned recently. Point-of-care tools for the evaluation of gastric content have evolved over time, often using gastric ultrasound. Usually, the gastric antral cross-sectional area (CSA) is determined. A liberal fluid fasting regimen, that is, ingestion of liquid fluids until the call for theatre, does not delay gastric emptying compared to midnight fasting, as evaluated with gastric ultrasound. Anesthesia is safe, and no adverse events result from a liberal regimen. Methods: The ethics committee of LMU Munich approved the study (21-0903). Liberal fluid fasting in a geriatric orthopedic surgery department (LFFgertrud) is a sub-study within a project investigating perioperative neurocognitive disorders (Study Registration: DRKS00026801). After obtaining informed consent from 134 geriatric patients 70 years or older, we investigated the gastric antral cross-sectional area (CSA) prior to and postimplementation of liberal fluid management, respectively. Results: After the implementation of liberal fluid fasting, fasting times for solid food and liquids decreased from 8.8 (±5.5) to 1.8 (±1.8) hours (p < 0.0001). In 39 patients where CSA was obtained, a slight increase in fluid was encountered. No critical amount of gastric content was observed, and no adverse events occurred. Conclusions: A liberal fluid fasting concept was safe even for comorbid elderly patients in orthopedic surgery. Applying a gastric ultrasound may be helpful to increase safety. According to the incidence of complications encountered in our study, it seems indispensable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saller et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: