This framework tackles time series disentanglement to enhance interpretability and accuracy in critical care.
Interpreting complex clinical time series is vital for patient safety and care, as it is both essential for supporting accurate clinical assessment and fundamental to building clinician trust and promoting effective clinical action. In complex time series analysis, decomposing a signal into meaningful underlying components is often a crucial means for achieving interpretability. This process is known as time series disentanglement. While deep learning models excel in predictive performance in this domain, their inherent complexity poses a major challenge to interpretability. Furthermore, existing time series disentanglement methods, including traditional trend or seasonality decomposition techniques, struggle to adequately separate clinically crucial specific components: static patient characteristics, condition trend, and acute events. Thus, a key technical challenge remains: developing an interpretable method capable of effectively disentangling these specific components in complex clinical time series. To address this challenge, we propose CoTD-VAE, a novel variational autoencoder framework for interpretable component disentanglement. CoTD-VAE incorporates temporal constraints tailored to the properties of static, trend, and event components, such as leveraging a Trend Smoothness Loss to capture gradual changes and an Event Sparsity Loss to identify potential acute events. These designs help the model effectively decompose time series into dedicated latent representations. We evaluate CoTD-VAE on critical care (MIMIC-IV) and human activity recognition (UCI HAR) datasets. Results demonstrate successful component disentanglement and promising performance enhancement in downstream tasks. Ablation studies further confirm the crucial role of our proposed temporal constraints. CoTD-VAE offers a promising interpretable framework for analyzing complex time series in critical applications like healthcare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: