Qualitative research reveals how distributed leadership enhances organizational performance at Sayed Jamaluddin Afghan University.
This study investigates the influence of distributed leadership models on university improvement, with a specific focus on Sayed Jamaluddin Afghan University (SJAU) in Afghanistan. As institutions of higher education face increasing demands for accountability, innovation, and collaborative governance, traditional top-down leadership approaches are proving inadequate. Distributed leadership, which emphasizes shared responsibility, collaboration, and collective decision-making, presents an alternative model better suited to modern academic environments. This research explores how distributed leadership practices affect organizational performance, faculty engagement, and institutional development at SJAU. The study employs a qualitative-method approach, with qualitative semi-structured interviews used to collect data from the head of the department. The findings revealed the extent to which distributed leadership contributes to academic and administrative improvement, decision-making effectiveness, and overall institutional growth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanif et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: