This experiment evaluates relative growth rate and nutrient absorption in Lactuca sativa under lead contamination, indicating sludge may enhance growth while reducing toxicity.
Cost-effective methods for improving soil fertility and mitigating the negative impact of heavy metal contamination in agricultural soils are currently under investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of soil lead (Pb) contamination and the application of secondary pulp and paper mill sludge on the relative growth rate (RGR) and its determinants, as well as the specific absorption rate (SAR) of nutrients of Lactuca sativa L. For the 46-day pot experiment, which was carried out in 2022 under controlled conditions at the Karelian Research Centre of RAS, sandy loam soil was used, to which Pb was added at rates of 0, 50, and 250 mg Pb(NO3)2 kg−1. Secondary sludge was applied with each watering at concentrations of 0%, 20%, and 40%. RGR values varied significantly, primarily due to changes in net assimilation rate (NAR) rather than specific leaf area. Positive relationships were found between RGR and NAR, and RGR and SAR of nitrogen and phosphorus, but not potassium. Sludge applications can stimulate NAR at early stages of plant growth. For plants grown on soil with the highest Pb concentration studied, secondary sludge reduced root lead content by an average of 35%. Soil contamination with lead increased nutrient SAR by 79 and 39% when applied as 20 and 40% sludge, respectively, while 40% sludge increased nitrogen SAR by 51% but did not change phosphorus and potassium SAR. A sludge-mediated reduction in root Pb content and an increase in NAR suggest that secondary paper sludge may contribute to the remediation of Pb-contaminated soils and reduce the toxicity of heavy metals to plants. The results may help in finding new ways to manage soil fertility, especially for contaminated soils.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikkonen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: