Analysis adds balloon payment scenarios to multiple contracts with constant amortization, suggesting new insights for financial institutions.
De-Losso, et al. (2013) should be credited as the first to show that, considering its cost of capital, a financial institution may be better off if a single contract is substituted by multiple contracts with their analysis focusing attention only in the case of constant installments. De Faro (2022) expanded the analysis to the case where the constant amortization scheme of debt amortization is the one considered by the financial institution. In this paper the case of balloon payments will be added to the constant amortization multiple contracts scheme.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: