Analysis revisits population sampling strategies for allele frequencies in DNA evidence, suggesting improvements.
Population databases allow us to attach probabilities to DNA evidence by the estimation of genotype frequencies, which rely on accurate allele frequency estimates. As short tandem repeat (STR) marker sets for human identification have expanded to include more discriminating markers, and especially now that sequencing techniques allow us to distinguish between alleles based on variation in underlying base-pair structure, it is important to reevaluate existing guidance on population database sizes for the estimation of allele frequencies. In this paper, we revisit the topic of population sampling by focusing on the representation of alleles, i.e. whether alleles are observed or not, in a sample of individuals containing data for highly polymorphic autosomal STR loci. The effect of both length- and sequence-based STR data on population sample size implications are demonstrated, and differences between lesser and more polymorphic markers are discussed. The consequences of using a limited number of individuals are explored and the impact of increasing population sample sizes by combining different data sets is shown to help determine the point at which further sampling may no longer provide significant value. Finally, different approaches for accommodating previously unobserved alleles and their impact on DNA evidence evaluations are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aalbers et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: