This analysis compares isolation forest, LOF, and LDA performance in detecting outliers in user reviews, indicating LDA's superior accuracy.
Outlier detection in user reviews is a critical task for identifying anomalous and potentially valuable insights within large datasets. This study presents a comparative analysis of three different algorithms for outlier detection in user reviews: isolation forest, local outlier factor (LOF), and latent dirichlet allocation (LDA). The performance of each algorithm was evaluated using accuracy and silhouette score for outlier detection and clustering quality. LDA performed best with 0.98 accuracy and a silhouette score of 0.13. Isolation forest followed with 0.90 accuracy and a score of 0.11. LOF had lower results with 0.42 accuracy and a score of -0.05 due to its sensitivity to neighbors. The study contributes by systematically exploring the impact of parameter variations on algorithm performance, providing valuable insights for high-dimensional text data analysis. Despite the promising results, limitations include the dependence on preprocessing and specific parameter settings. Future work will explore hybrid approaches and broader datasets to enhance scalability and adaptability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sidek et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: