This review highlights innovation dynamics shaped by technology diffusion and geopolitical rivalry, suggesting engagement is crucial for societal trust.
Technological innovation in the intelligent‑media era is shaped by the intersecting dynamics of diffusion trajectories, geopolitical rivalry, and communicative narratives. Building on discussions from the High Table Dialogue at the MHM 2025 Symposium, this review charts China’s shift from an import-led “leap‑frog” strategy to a model of self-reliant research and development—an evolution hastened by U.S. export controls and other external chokepoints. Sustaining industrial competitiveness now requires synchronising domestic growth cycles with volatile global conditions, a task for which high-performance computing platforms are becoming indispensable strategic assets. Although artificial intelligence (AI) has accelerated R&D processes, transformative breakthroughs continue to rely on tacit, experience-based knowledge and iterative experimentation. Corporate patents that cite academic literature already outnumber their U.S. counterparts, yet the low average citation count per patent highlights enduring deficits in fundamental research depth and university–industry collaboration. Heightened public caution toward high‑uncertainty technologies—such as gene editing and AI—further exposes the limitations of one‑way, didactic communication; instead, inclusive two‑way engagement with NGOs, civil society, and other stakeholders is crucial if “technology for good” is to become a credible, shared commitment that links scientific progress with societal trust and geopolitical resilience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiachen Yan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: