Proposed GNN model improves carbon footprint estimation for LLM inference, highlighting limitations of existing methods.
Throughout its lifecycle, an LLM incurs significantly higher carbon emissions during inference than training. Inference requests vary in batch size, prompt length, and token generation, while cloud providers deploy heterogeneous GPU configurations to meet diverse service-level objectives. Unlike training, inference exhibits lower and highly variable hardware utilization, making equation-based carbon models unreliable. Existing network-based estimators lack accuracy, as they fail to account for the distinct prefill and decode phases, hardware-specific features, and realistic request distributions. We propose LLMCO 2 , a graph neural network (GNN)-based model, to improve the accuracy of LLM inference carbon footprint estimation by ~ 67% over prior approaches. Source code is available at https://github.com/fuzhenxiao/LLMCO 2 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: