PulseJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025

Analytical Prediction for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

KQKrisna Nuresa QodriMFMuhammad Rausan FikriLALuthfi Ardi

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This analysis compares prediction accuracy of machine learning methods for chronic kidney disease, suggesting optimal early detection tools.

Key Points

  • Naive Bayes yielded the highest accuracy of 94.21% in predicting chronic kidney disease.
  • Random Forest achieved an impressive 90.50% accuracy, indicating strong predictive capabilities.
  • Three machine learning methods, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, and SVM, were evaluated for chronic kidney disease prediction accuracy.
  • These prediction models can significantly aid in the early detection and management of chronic kidney disease.

Cite This Study

Qodri et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1bb5b54b1d3bfb60eceefhttps://doi.org/10.61902/jkti.v1i1.1686
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share