Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis evaluates mobility assessment using activity monitors in hospitalized patients, indicating potential challenges in accuracy.
Patient mobility during hospitalization is essential for high-quality healthcare as mobility is linked to physical function and quality of life. The Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) scale is a validated method to assess mobility in hospitalized patients. Although the JH-HLM is widely utilized, it has limitations including ceiling effects, unobserved mobility events going unrecorded, and the staff time needed to observe and document.We explored the feasibility of using a consumer-grade activity monitor (Fitbit) to predict JH-HLM scores and address these limitations.JH-HLM scores and step counts were recorded simultaneously using behavioral mapping and analyzed over 1-hour periods among inpatients. We predicted JH-HLM scores based on step counts by fitting ordinal logistic regressions, according to three categorizations of JH-HLM scores reflecting increasing mobility-granularity.We collected data for 189 patient-hours in a cohort of 20 participants. Step counts increased with higher JH-HLM mobility scores. When predicting JH-HLM scores from step counts, there was a trade-off between accuracy and mobility granularity: overall accuracy was 75% when categorizing patient-hours as immobility (JH-HLM of 1 to 5) or mobility (JH-HLM of 6 to 8); accuracy was 68% when categorizing immobility, shorter walking behavior (JH-HLM of 6 to 7), and longer walking behavior (JH-HLM of 8); accuracy was 61% when categorizing immobility and three progressively higher volumes of walking (JH-HLM of 6, 7 and 8).Step counts from the activity monitor could be used to predict whether a patient was immobile or mobile but may lack the sensitivity to accurately predict specific mobility levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stenum et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: