Research reveals inadequacies in India's legal framework for cybercrime, highlighting the need for international cooperation and legislative reform.
This research critically examines the inadequacies of India's current legal framework in addressing the rising threat of cybercrime, particularly under the Information Technology Act, 2000. Through in-depth case studies such as the Cosmos Bank cyber heist and the Bulli Bai/Sulli Deals incidents, it reveals systemic flaws in legislation, investigation, and enforcement. A comparative analysis with global cybercrime frameworks specifically those of the United States, United Kingdom, and Singapore underscores the need for India to modernize its laws, enhance cyber forensic capabilities, and foster international cooperation. The study advocates for the enactment of comprehensive cybercrime legislation, establishment of specialized cybercrime units, and increased training for law enforcement and judiciary. Emphasizing public awareness and digital literacy as foundational elements of cyber resilience, the paper concludes that India must adopt a proactive, future-ready approach to protect its digital infrastructure and ensure justice in the cyber age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: